Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legend of Zelda: Blade of the Ancients


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

The Legend of Zelda: Blade of the Ancients
Tagged for speedy delete, with listed reason: "Unreleased game, no way to verify details. Possible hoax." This is not a speedy delte reason, but it is areason for listing on AfD. Nom made on behalf of tagging user and to get this away frm an improper speedy. Abstain. DES (talk) 06:57, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete My bad, I speedied it as basically nonsense. Is an unreleased game with no verifiable details really notable enough for an Encyclopedia entry? How can we even verify that the pictures are from the game?TheRingess 06:59, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Web search brings up one page.... http://www.listentome.net/games72.php Sethie 07:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable, possible hoax. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-03 07:07Z 
 * Delete Hoax. The site Sethie mentioned above says about that page: OMG, RARE NES GAMES!!!11 In our neck of the woods "rare"="make-believe." --Pagrashtak 10:46, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm a big Zelda fan, and I've never heard of this game. Probable hoax.  I'll change my vote if better evidence can be supplied. -- MisterHand 14:40, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax. FredOrAlive 18:50, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per TheRingess. Dan 18:51, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax. NeoJustin 00:10, January 4, 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Complete and utter hoax. The photoshopped screenshots on the referenced page are pretty good though - but not good enough to keep up suspension of disbelief. (Just look at "The Wizard" shots and ask yourself "Could Nintendo even consider releasing this crap?") so I guess the page itself is just for Amusement Purposes and not a credible source. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 01:40, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per hoax. Dustimagic 20:31, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.