Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legend of Zelda (Wii) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

The Legend of Zelda (Wii)
For now, the Zelda release on Wii is Twilight Princess; there is no reference to any other Zelda at this time. This is a phony article to generate traffic to a Web site, and should be deleted for all the same reasons it was deleted last year. Primarily, the "crystal ball" rule. The absolute earliest point at which this article should exist is when we have official confirmation that there is a Zelda in the works on the Wii that is not Twilight Princess AND when have at least one or two specific, verifiable facts to offer readers about this new Zelda. The Yar 15:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and WP:NOT a crystal ball clause. Existence is not verifiable.  Also, it appears from the nom that a similar article was deleted last year?  If this is the case and this is close enough to be a recreation, someone should consider a speedy delete under WP:CSD.--Isotope23 17:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nothings verifiable about this game even exists, so far all the page does is talk about speculation which is not what Wikipedia is intended for. Deathawk 18:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Isotope23. Sandstein 19:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd been thinking about nominating it myself. &mdash; Ian Moody (talk) 21:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to its own section in the Twilight Princess article. --Nathew 04:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to TP.--Toffile 21:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with the TP article, giving it a small section. Something about how TP and ZWii might, or might not be the same game.
 * Delete and redirect to Twilight Princess. Also, falls under WP:NOT a crystal ball. --Dakart 19:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to TP, with a small note there to mention the confusion. Seems the best suggestion to me. --The Yar (nom) 14:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk  to Nihonjo e  15:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  15:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Lordwow 14:46, 10 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.