Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legend of Zelda (Wii) (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. No rationale was specified by the nominator, and there are no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 19:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

The Legend of Zelda (Wii)

 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

No rationale has been provided by the nominator for why this article should be deleted. The article describes an upcoming video game, and a quick search has found numerous media references to this game. Keep. -Nicktalk 16:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Keep. Nintendo CEO Iwata confirmed it on IGN and creator Miyamoto also confirmed, plus there are aton of games and movies that have articals that will be released after this gaame so there is no reason to delete it.-- Saint Pedrolas J. Hohohohohoh merry christmas 20:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Keep. This is probably one of the most pointless AfDs I have ever seen. This is an article about an upcoming game from a critically acclaimed series. It is highly notable, and there is no reason to delete it. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 22:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, but this is well beyond a rumor. Nintendo's confirmation in it of itself satisfies WP:N. 2 says you, says two 05:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Keep. It is official news now. No longer speculation. Faythoffenrir (talk) 15:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - It's a confirmed game from a clearly notable series of games. Plus the nom didn't give a reason for why it should be deleted. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  15:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Neutral - Pokémon is a "clearly notable series of games" and Pokémon HeartGold and SoulSilver wasn't un-merged until a month before the Japan release date, because we were waiting for more information to actually build an article. Super Mario Galaxy 2 has an article because it has a good amount of information released about it, as you can see from the gameplay section. I see no reason why this game is any different. As it game might be notable, it doesn't have much to stand on. Blake (Talk·Edits) 16:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Nintendo i believe has confirmed the release this year, so were not exactly Crystal balling here. In addition there is no reason presented by the nominater on why the article should be deleted. Until a valid reason is presented i have to err on keeping Ottawa4ever (talk) 18:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.