Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lego Movie 2 (2017)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow close. This is a bit early, but the consensus seems to be clear that this is too soon for a separate article at this time. I won't redirect this, as we already have a functional redirect at The Lego Movie 2. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:11, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

The Lego Movie 2 (2017)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of the article fails WP:CRYSTAL at this moment with very few details known, and as such is not worth an article of its own (a mention on Lego Movie will suffice). Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 18 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:NFF.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:Crystal, also only source appears to be a Russian language news site Elassint  Hi 17:15, 18 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect/Merge for now to The Lego Movie where production and plans for a sequel can be spoken about in context. To politely disagree with, we do have multiple reliable sources speaking toward its pre-production.et al And to agree with the nom, it's TOO SOON for a separate article, but expanding coverage allows that it can be spoken of somewhere even when its own article is premature. ?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 18:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC) Struck See below.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 07:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON. Rebuild (chortle) if/when it's actually going to be released.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:12, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge per Schmidt Orser67 (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Lego Movie. Too early yet for an article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:44, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete There is already a redirect in place from The Lego Movie 2, this is not a plausible search term. --j⚛e deckertalk 01:38, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Good point. I missed that it was a duplication. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:26, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Struck my previous "!vote". created the first article,  moved it into the Captain's sandbox.  moved it back into article space, and then the Captain merged information into into the target and set the redirect himself.   The original redirect preserved a far better article than this sorry stub, and I agree that the title version being discussed here is a poor search subject. Heck, even "Lego-Movie-sequel" gives far better results.  The current redirect already and properly sends readers to the best place for this to be written of.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 07:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.