Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Leisure Coffee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 01:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

The Leisure Coffee
No references, no google, unverifiable. Kappa 01:19, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Kappa -- Ruby  01:28, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - The AFD notice has been attempted to be removed by anon IP. -- light darkness (talk) 01:36, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Probable hoax.  Their last album was "The Sock Put-its" and they are working on a 19 minute epic song in response to "Stonehenge" by Spinal Tap. Thatcher131 01:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * keep: only on the principal that we should follow wiki process by putting up WP:V unsourced first. Give the editors time to find something. Etc... etc... Seeing as this is a new article I assume these may be new editors. So I would sugest we not be so WP:DENSE and follow wiki policy to make wiki a friendlier place not a discouragement. --CyclePat 02:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant hoax. "M.R Smith, previously a wandering Eucalyptus tree salesman based in Mexico and the United Arab Emirites, stowed away in the hold of a huge drug-paraphenalia smuggling ship, to The Gold-Paved streets of London Town, where he survived for two weeks by eating his own shoes and hat."   dbtfz talk 02:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. A band that would pass WP:NMG would turn up in a Google search. It's bullocks. PJM 04:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Jim62sch 04:14, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Ter e nce Ong 04:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Avery W. Krouse 05:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Kinu t /c  06:04, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. as a hoax. feydey 13:34, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TVXPert 14:58, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: Real band...the lack of internet reference is explained — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.192.96 (talk • contribs)
 * Unfortunately reality is not enough, verifiability is essential. There's also the question of WP:MUSIC. Kappa 01:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * So even if the band is real, if there is no internet proof, it's not considered Wikipedia material?
 * Just because a band is real doesn't mean it necessarily qualifies for having its own wikipedia article. It also must be notable.  See this link for what is required for a band to be notable: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:MUSIC  --Xyzzyplugh 14:25, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Knowitall 18:50, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable band.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:50, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.