Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Liberals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Liberal. NW ( Talk ) 16:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

The Liberals

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notability. There appears to be no independent information on this group, nor can I find any media references (even trivial ones) to them. There's simply no evidence that this group exists, and if they do, no evidence that I can see which suggests that it's anything other than a small group of like-minded friends, not as a group worthy of a Wikipedia article. See page's discussion page for full story. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpidge (talk • contribs)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment, if deleted this should redirect to Liberal 76.66.196.139 (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment, if kept, this should be renamed to The Liberals (Ireland) and the prime name should redirect to Liberal. 76.66.196.139 (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. B.Rossow talk contr 19:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:53, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I was privileged enough to join the LYMEC team campaigning with the Liberals in Dublin over the Lisbon treaty. They have been getting more and more attention and I'm sure you'll be seeing more of them in the future. I raise one trivial blog post mentioning them Rbrown115 (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete no mainstream media sources whatsoever. Completely non-notable and self-generated content. If they do start getting more attention, we can always re-instate the article. — Blue-Haired Lawyer 13:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.