Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Life of Graham Greene (Volume 2)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The Life of Graham Greene (Volume 2)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This does not seem to be a notable volume of a notable biography. First of all, it is completely unreferenced. Second, it is nothing but a table of contents. Third, it is one volume of a three-volume publication, and those are not individually notable unless they're part of the Waverley Novels. Now, it is entirely possible that The Life of Graham Greene is notable (see claim on Norman Sherry but that article does not exist, so it is not verifiably notable yet and we have nothing to merge this to. The same goes for Life of Graham Greene (Volume 3), which I will tag for AfD as well. Note re: possible merge: I don't see the point of that, given that these have no verified encyclopedic content, and as search terms they are useless, so no need for a redirect either. Drmies (talk) 18:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, but without prejudice to creation of a better article about the entire three-volume publication. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Looks more like a table of contents than an encyclopedia article. If there is an article on the biography, it should be a single piece combining the three volumes — assuming sourcing can be mustered to defend that. As for this specific case, pretty clearly something that needs to go away. Carrite (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.