Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Life of a Song


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn Enough sources have popped up during the course of this afd that I feel WP:CRYSTAL is no longer violated. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

The Life of a Song

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:CRYSTAL. Only seondary source at all is the Roughstock blog cited, which I'm not entirely sure is a reliable source. Absolutely nothing else than the duo's own website even verifies this album. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   --  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've added another source from the Sugar Hill Records webiste, which has the album cover, track listing, and release date. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 19:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Meh, that's a primary source. Not really much better. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Well for Heaven's sake!! What do you want? Ha! EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 00:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Multiple reliable third-party sources. There're only 8 hits on Google for this album right now, I think it's a little WP:CRYSTALish. Who knows where the heck Roughstock got their info from? Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:35, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep -- it appears as though there are sourced track listing and info about it CloversMallRat (talk) 02:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I think the sources can be trusted. The official site is usually very reliable and I think Roughstock is reliable too. RidersDX (talk) 03:46, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.