Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Line of Polity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 13:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

The Line of Polity
Utter nonsense, non-encyclopedic. See also:Articles for deletion/The Skinner -- MisterHand 16:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no context, doesn't really make sense.--Alhutch 17:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Should this perhaps be db-nonsense instead? It is incoherent. -- (aeropagitica)   18:16, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment apparently, this is a book by Neal Asher. I have put a notice on the creator's talk page inviting him/her to edit the article in such a way that we understand what this is supposed to be talking about.  But even as a book description it doesn't make much sense to me.  --MisterHand 18:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete pure gibberish. Who writes this crap? Atrian 19:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. MisterHand is correct that it is a book and one that probably would rate its own article if we actually had an article.  This current "article" is pure gibberish and needs to be deleted.  I dislike the apparent present practice of keeping such nonsense around just because the putative subject is notable. We should only keep such articles if the subject is notable and the article is intelligible.  Madman 22:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC) (I'll get off my soapbox now).
 * Delete - I wish i could be this imaginative. NJ 22:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete pa. To be that imaginative would require a large dosage of something illegal. Dan 22:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment at my urging, the original author has provided some context, and modified the article. -- MisterHand 14:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment It would seem to me that the people requesting deletion have little or no clue about the subject they wish deleted, they consider it nonsense even though the article is far from completion. I guess if I would have written the next bit and come here to add it and found my article deleted I would have not been happy at all. All because some people do not have the common to research thier complaint before action. Instead of voting for deletion why not just keep your ideas too yourselves or add relevant information if you have any. Planktune 15:18, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. KHM03 17:52, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.