Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Listing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as created by a sock of a banned/blocked user.  Hut 8.5  22:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

The Listing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested WP:PROD. Pre-release film with no evidence that the film's production is itself notable. No objection to un-deletion without WP:Deletion review if and when the film CLEARLY meets Wikipedia's notability requirements in the eyes of any administrator willing to un-delete it. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  04:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; also likely that this is promotional block evasion by User:MikePlant1, have raised an SPI. --McGeddon (talk) 10:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * User:MovieWatcher33 has now been confirmed as a sock of MikePlant at this SPI, so I've flagged the article for speedy deletion on that basis (the only other edits have been IPs fixing typos and removing deletion templates). --McGeddon (talk) 15:26, 17 January 2017 (UTC)


 * alts
 * year/typr::
 * working title:
 * filmmaker:


 * Delete for at kindest being too soon for an article. In agreement with, the topic might be undeleted only when or if WP:NF is ever met.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.