Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Little Flowers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

The Little Flowers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No sources, no evidence anywhere of notability. PROD was contested without any explanation by IP (almost certainly the author, judging by editing history). JamesBWatson (talk) 09:02, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually PROD was contested with explanation by me, certainly not the article author. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:27, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The PROD was contested by an IP editor, and then restored in collateral damage by a bot edit. This restored PROD was then removed by Phil Bridger. I had seen the removal by the IP and had not seen the (incorrect) restoration and (correct) re-removal when I wrote above. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, but... potential keep if sources are found and someone rewrites it. A TV show running nationally for 27 years almost certainly has some core of notability, and presumably reliable sources somewhere.  That said, the current article is virtual nonsense, presumably machine-tanslated, with phrases like "girl strawberry cake and a massive slide animation of global brands".  To sum up: completely incomprehensible article, (probably) notable subject, would need 100% rewrite to be kept. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Undecided. Apparently notable topic, but a really poor translation from Vietnamese of vi:Những bông hoa nhỏ. "Girl strawberry cake" is apparently a reference to Strawberry Shortcake. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per no RS Someone65 (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.