Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Little Mermaid III: Melody's Story


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   23:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The Little Mermaid III: Melody's Story
The article itself notes that this film isn't going to be made. Why have an article on a non-existent film? IrishGuy  talk  19:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as admited hoax. (I can't find a speedy category for it, but that seems appropriate.)  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 19:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hoax is not a speedy category, though many have argued it should be. Fan1967 19:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hoax is not a speedy category, but if the article says it's a hoax, isn't it nonsense? &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not non-sense since it is somewhat of a rational thought and it's ridiculous. It would be a speedy if it said, "OMFG! LOL! THE PRIEST HAS ONE IN THE FIRST MOVIE!" That would be . Yanksox 20:13, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict)Delete I'm pretty sure it's not a speedy, but delete as hoax. Yanksox 19:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with incredible speed I REALLY despise that being an obvious hoax (but not nonsense) is not criteria for speedy deletion. A blatant hoax should not need to be prodded, it should just be gone. -- Kicking222 21:41, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - while not a hoax (spec sheets for the upcoming DVD release of the original film mentioned a sneak peek at the music for TLM3), it appears that the film has been shelved by Disney and won't happen anytime soon. Therefore, ditch the, er... you know... TheRealFennShysa 21:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because. Danny Lilithborne 01:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: While there were seemed to have been plans before, but now that it has been scrapped then there is no longer any use for this page without any reliable source now that Internet Movie Database's page on this movie has been deleted. -Adv193 01:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —   pd_THOR  undefined | 03:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and be thankful this movie isn't being made. Ace of Sevens 06:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed. Ðra 09:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. Per original nomination. &mdash;  Mike  &bull;  19:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete although calling it a hoax is rather overboard. It was one of many films that were slated for Disney released but were cancelled once John Lasseter took over as Chief Creative Officer.  That deserves a mention somewhere.  Aguerriero  ( talk ) 22:15, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.