Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lloyd Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

The Lloyd Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find any substantial coverage of these awards by news sources (though this certainly isn't my area of familiarity). I suspect the topic doesn't meet WP:GNG, but I'd appreciate some input from others. Ajpolino (talk) 15:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ajpolino (talk) 15:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ajpolino (talk) 15:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 11:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   05:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. These awards appear to be simply recognitions made by a single blogger, with no other voters and no media coverage that I can find outside the blog itself. (See http://boomboxserenade.typepad.com/boombox_serenade/the_lloyd_awards/ for the blog's own postings of the award.) No evidence of notability has been provided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable at all. No apparent coverage except for the blog that "hosts" these awards. Imalawyer (talk) 06:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Article has only an external link to the blog as a source. Searching found nothing helpful.  Meets no notability guideline. Gab4gab (talk) 13:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Given that the two main contributors are users named Boomboxserenade (the name of the blog) and Sjcoulter (the name of the blogger), this probably qualifies for WP:A11. The other contributions appear to be typos, wikilinks and other automated minutiae.
 * At any rate, this is a non-notable award from a non-notable blog from non-notable writer. Timothy Joseph Wood  18:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Bereft of independent sourcing. No claimn of notability. No more notable than my "Best Grandpa Ever" Award, which is at least tangibly evidenced by a coffee mug. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 19:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:GNG. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 17:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.