Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lone Shark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  03:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

The Lone Shark

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Poorly sourced (its sole footnote is a YouTube clip of its own opening/closing credits, which is not support for notability at all) article about a minor public access program. As always, television shows are not "inherently" notable just because they existed, and have to show evidence of passing WP:GNG on reliable source coverage about them, but there's no evidence of that being shown here, and the article has been tagged for sourcing problems since 2014 without improvement. I'm also bundling a completely unsourced episode list, and note that both articles are extremely overloaded with much deeper levels of detail than their lack of reliable sourcing can bear, suggesting the distinct possibility that there's been some conflict of interest editing by people who were directly involved in the show (a concern not at all allayed by the fact that they were both created by a virtual WP:SPA named "BigHandzCT".) Bearcat (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  22:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Arbitrarily0   ( talk ) 03:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Connecticut. Bearcat (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Utterly non-notable public access program. Now appears to be a podcast, but searches in WP:LIBRARY and newspapers.com return nada -- I can't even verify it ever existed as a TV show. Jfire (talk) 04:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment. There is more verbage here compared to zero real references. Weird! Leaning delete, but due to the volume of the article, going to wait and take a deeper look. Jacona (talk) 14:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.