Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lords (demogroup)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 22:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

The Lords (demogroup)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An article about a non-notable demogroup. Λeternus (talk) 10:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is unfortunately very little online information about The Lords. This is not in itself reason to flag the non-notability card.  If nothing else, notability is established by association with The Judges. --Frodet (talk) 20:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, notability is not inherited. --Λeternus (talk) 07:49, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. The problem with the nature of demogroups in general and their activities, the time period and the target audience makes it very hard to find sources which are online - or not online for that matter.  I keep adding sources as I find them ("The Lords" crops up in an awful lot of places...). I still believe they are notable due to their early arrival and the volume and quality of releases (released internationally by Outlet, see also ). --Frodet (talk) 22:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll add this to the list as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Viznut/Deletionist_attacks_against_demoscene_articles Numtek (talk) 03:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep as we have a newspaper article especially noting their sound-chip skills and at least two of their productions was published as covermount of the Outlet magazine. They thus fulfil WP:NONPROFIT. // Liftarn (talk)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:40, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)




 * Comment - It will be difficult to assess notability using internet searches of a group that started in 1986 and is no longer with us. ~KvnG 16:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * As it is the article is supported by six newspaper articles and a handful of other sources. Not that bad. If someone could read trough the Demo&Co columns in old issues of Advanced ZAT Programming we could probably expand it. // Liftarn (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.