Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lost Hero


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. T. Canens (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

The Lost Hero

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, especially when there are no reliable sources to indicate notability. — m o n o   04:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - restore once the book is published, if notability for this particular work is established. Looking at the author's article, I see the majority of his books have their own articles, but a few don't, so we can wait and see.  Sea photo Talk  04:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep or perhaps redirect. Searching Google News brought up articles from The Independent, The New York Times, and The Associated Press. Clearly deletion isn't warranted here, but I have no objections to redirecting this if others argue against an outright keep. AniMate  07:47, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I`ve seen less notable books having articles. I say we should keep this article for the mean time, and as more information is released, add it to the article. There is already plenty of information on this book. Alec scheat (talk) 08:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I`d just like to also mention that this article is now starting to take shape, including the plotline for the first two chapters. With the information in this article, I see now reason now to get rid of it if we are going to have to redo it all again. Alec scheat (talk) 12:43, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - Substantial coverage by national publications. Shadowjams (talk) 09:41, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep -There has been a release date already established so deletion of this article would be a waste of time as one would have to remake this article when publication of the book is very imminent, as it will be released in a few short months. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.246.191.90 (talk) 19:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.