Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lost Religion of Jesus

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was 'Delete --Allen3 talk July 6, 2005 20:18 (UTC)

The Lost Religion of Jesus
(also a redirect LOST RELIGION OF JESUS).

This is an ad for a completely non-notable yahoo group with only 1 member. Fawcett5 28 June 2005 21:29 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable. Wikipedia is not a recruiting center for new religions. -- BD2412 talk June 28, 2005 21:32 (UTC)
 * Not a bad advertising job, actually, for a non-notable sect. Delete. Fire Star 28 June 2005 21:37 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an advertising space.
 * Delete, although I must say, that is a fine advert job. --Adun
 * Delete as advertising/spam. --Idont Havaname 28 June 2005 23:50 (UTC)
 * Delete advertising. JamesBurns 29 June 2005 05:55 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only one member?  Wow.--Kross June 29, 2005 18:47 (UTC)
 * Delete Ridiculous. SchmuckyTheCat 29 June 2005 22:45 (UTC)
 * Delete Obviously a bunch of fucking Reds. (unsigned contribution by User:67.10.73.69)
 * Delete. nn. neo-religion. jni 30 June 2005 06:44 (UTC)
 * Comment (I am gonna kinda play Devil's Advocate here so bear with me) Although this group is not huge, this page does not appear to be advertising. It is a statement of beliefs, facts even, about the group. Some comments made so far have been ridiculous ("Obviously a bunch of fucking Reds" by the anon editor - if it is sarcasm I'm sorry I can't tell), bordering on offensive. The notability policy of Wikipedia is confusing at best, so maybe it is best to keep it for a while, and see wht happens. Batmanand 30 June 2005 08:49 (UTC)
 * "not huge"? Gimme a break, its one dude. Fawcett5 30 June 2005 12:31 (UTC)


 * Delete. Maybe I'll reconsider it when they get another member. Shoaler 30 June 2005 16:56 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.