Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lost and the Damned


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ff m  12:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

The Lost and the Damned

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:SOURCES by relying on primary sources. Article has questionable notability - the faction does not have a codex (book that lists the army to enable them to be played in a game of Warhammer 40,000). -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 14:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete: Does this subject have any sources or notability outside of Warhammer?   RGTraynor  17:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:35, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete- More 40Kruft. As JediLofty says, this mob doesn't have their own rule book. This makes it unlikely that there exist any sources, let alone reliable ones, to substantiate this article. Reyk  YO!  05:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like a game manual. Not appropriate for wikipedia.  --Kraftlos (talk) 09:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless there's some sort of list (Warhammer characters and factions?) to merge it to. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Chaos (Warhammer) - not notable --T-rex 18:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Warhammer 40,000 or whatever. Lacks real-world notability and therefore fails WP:N, also appears to fail WP:FICTION. There's probably a Warhammer wiki/wikia that would have it though. – Toon (talk)  20:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.