Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Luciferian Order


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE &mdash;Wh o uk (talk) 15:19, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

The Luciferian Order
ed by User:RasputinAXP as "a small offshoot consisting of three people", prod tags removed by User:Cro..Scream, a fan of the named Aaron C. Donahue, whose article was recently deleted. This looks a lot like a walled garden, along with James Donahue and Cro..Scream's uncited addition of attacks into Ed Dames (I'm quite happy to believe that any psychic is a fraud, but allegations from a competitor of the same ilk are to be treated with caution, I think). This article is uncited, apparently unverifiable from neutral sources (none of the five unique Googles qualifies), obviously written from an insider's perspective and in my view fails to establish the encyclopaedic notability of the group. Just zis Guy you know? 21:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete At the very least, unverifiable. Is Cro Aaron, or just a big fan? Don't know, don't care, doesn't matter. Fan1967 22:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Guy, and probably have to protect from recreation. Yeesh.  &middot; rodii &middot;  23:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete &#0149;Jim 62 sch&#0149;  23:45, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 01:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow. That's all I can say.  Wow.  Delete as unverifiable and, in any case, nn.  Joe 05:31, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Not only does that article consist out of two different orders, the existence of both can not be disputed seeing the writers have profided links. it needs a cleanup i suggest making a list of all the incorrect statements. Cro..Scream
 * Delete, per nom. --JerryOrr 12:20, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as the prodder. *prods further* RasputinAXP   c  13:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. --Ed (Edgar181) 19:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (and HAIL SATAN!) Zero sharp 00:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.