Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lucky One (Taylor Swift song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Maybe keep, maybe merge, maybe delete. There's no consensus after 4 full listing periods. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:19, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

The Lucky One (Taylor Swift song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Should be deleted, with a redirection back to the parent album Red. Per WP:NSONGS, whilst charting does make a song a notable, notability aside there should be extensive coverage of the song as a primary subject. In this case there isnt, and chart positions could easily be added back to the album. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:21, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 28.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  17:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep This passes NSONGS No. 2 criterion three-times.HotHat (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to the album. --Michig (talk) 07:26, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The album article is already to verbose that this is not feasible in the first place because it is in great violation of SIZERULE, so that is the reason these must either be deleted or kept. They meet the criterion of No. 2 and these sources confirm No. 1 The New Zealand Herald and Grantland. So, now it must be kept, or else wikipedia's rules don't matter at all!HotHat (talk) 04:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 05:26, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.