Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The MRQ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 05:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The MRQ

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Poorly sourced Vanispamcruftisement article about a non-notable musical group. Fails WP:BAND Dolovis (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:11, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - They have an entry int he Canadian Pop Encyclopedia. Because it is behind a paywall, it is unclear how substantial this NY Times article is.  I suspect that due to era in which the band played, articles will tend to be in offline sources. -- Whpq (talk) 21:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep meets WP:BAND 6. The band is related to McKenna Mendelson Mainline and Luke & The Apostles and Mike McKenna.  Argolin (talk) 04:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Argolin. -DJSasso (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.