Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magnum Opus of a Proud Dyslexic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was userfied and deleted as a personal essay of an individual who did not assert their importance as per WP:BIO. (aeropagitica) 11:54, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

The Magnum Opus of a Proud Dyslexic

 * View single debate
 * View single debate

This article is massively inconsistent with WP:NPOV. John254 01:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I think the user should be banned, All he does is make useless speech pages. Geobeedude 01:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Incredibly obvious delete Why was this not just prodded, or perhaps tagged for speedying as nonsense? -- Kicking222 01:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This is more or less nonsense. --Wafulz 01:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN then speedy delete as nonsense. So tagged. MER-C 03:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Careful. While the article is not appropriate, it does not qualify as nonsense. Please review Patent nonsense which explains things that, while inappropriate, do not qualify as patent nonsense. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Considering the user's edit history, this is arguably nonsense. He/she has a habit of creating essays (or editing existing articles) with the most random topics. Anyway, userfication probably isn't appropriate here because Wikipedia is not a free webhost. --Wafulz 04:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This is a personal essay, not an encyclopedia article, and it might be a copyright violation from . The reason I say it "might" be is that the contributor claims to be "Mista Mo" himself, in which case the problem would not be copyright violation but personal opinion. --Metropolitan90 05:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh so very strong delete and let the user know that, since Latin uses inflective rather than syntactical word order, there is no meaningful difference between "magnum opus" and "opus magnum" - Che Nuevara  07:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Personal essay. Westenra 07:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speediest Delete Is this supposed to be a joke? Scratching my head!  B  e  a  rly  541  07:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete I see no possible way to butcher/carve/edit the article to make it notable. -WarthogDemon 07:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. WP:NOT a place for original research, nor for soapboxing. >< Richard  Ω6  12  '''ER 09:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.