Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Man Who Fell to Earth (musical)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 08:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

The Man Who Fell to Earth (musical)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article makes no assertion of notability. Notable source material, but the musical is ultimately NN. &mdash; Music Maker  03:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Most of the links at the bottom of the page are simply links to Wikipedia pages to be edited, and the one link that says this is even coming is the site for the play itself.  I hope they do this, but right now, it's still crystalballery. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 04:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as crystalballery.--Ispy1981 05:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, may be real but is not notable. At such time as production moves forward this may change, but as yet there is no justification for an article. --Dhartung | Talk 07:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Jmlk  1  7  08:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Consider Now that's very unfair to remove any content to the contrary of what you've said.  The songs are real.  I provided you with the means to contact the composer.  The play has a website. Just because it hasn't hit the stage yet doesn't mean it shouldn't be acknoweldged.  The page never once implies that it's already on Broadway.  I know from experience with this particular production that it's still unclear when or if it'll hit the stage.  But that's why it's classified as being in production.  That certainly doesn't mean we shouldn't acknowledge it, does it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JTheGoblinKing (talk • contribs).
 * — JTheGoblinKing (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Reply JTheGoblinKing, Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists, it's an encyclopedia consisting of notable things and as such selective. Fairness isn't a policy. As it is "unclear" in your own words "when or if" it will have a performance, it would violate our policy against using a crystal ball to predict what productions are notable before they are actually notable. --Dhartung | Talk 17:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete; at this point, this falls under WP:CRYSTAL - if it goes to the stage and actually becomes notable, with multiple reliable sources, then great, but right now, it doesn't have notability enough for an article. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 03:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nomination, WP:NOTE and those above. NSR 77  T C  04:20, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.