Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Manitowoc Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Obvious keep per nom's withdrawal and other comments.. --Hetar 07:38, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

The Manitowoc Company
Delete - ad placed here by company employee. Prod removed without explanation. Wickethewok 02:41, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Change to keep - now presented with actual info, instead of "leading manufacturer of blahblahblah..." i go with keep. Wickethewok 04:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP --[[Image:Flag of India.svg|20px]]Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  ) '' 02:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * This company has a long and colorful history in this town. Can someone point me to a resource that I can follow to actually allow me to post an entry without retribution(deletion)? Mikeputnam 03:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Deletion is just a form of Wikipedia clean-up. It isn't meant as retribution. Can you give some evidence the company is notable? Read WP:CORP for guidelines. --Ginkgo100 03:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep I believe this meets WP:CORP. It's a notable manufacturer listed on significant financial indices and news stories are written when they file their quarterly reports: . Side note: A restaurant I worked in had two Manitowoc ice machines. They broke down constantly. I'm sure the other stuff they make is great . . . ScottW 04:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep 8,000 full-time employees, publicly traded, company more than 150 years old, revenue into the billions... need I go on? Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  04:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - notable company (US$3 billion market cap) Outriggr 07:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.