Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Marghuz Va'li Illustrated


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 10:00, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

The Marghuz Va'li Illustrated
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Is this a family photo album? The only contents seem to be a series of pictures with captions extolling Prof. Dr. Taskeen Ahmad Khan and Prof. Dr. Iftikhar Ahmad Khan. These gentlemen may be notable in their own right, but this article IMHO isn't. Favonian (talk) 12:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unreferenced gallery with no encyclopedic use that (to be honest) could be being used as a slightly subtle form of spam. Ironholds (talk) 13:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

It is said "An Illustration Explains a Thousand Words." So this Section Must be Allowed to Thrive, Flourish etc. As it has been Already Mentioned by the Editors of this Section that they are Going to Gradually Paste & Put Images Relevant to the Geography, History, Contributions of the Most Renowned Figures etc. of the Village Marghuz throuhout the Periods (Indeed it would a Most Rare Collection of the Illustrations for the Public Display for the First Time). So let those Images Gradually Come with the Passage of the Time - so we must Wait with the Extreme Degree of the Patience. It is Highly Hoped that Each of those Images shall be Self Explanatory for a Thousand Words (with their Respective Captions too). It is also said "With Words I only Know. With Illustrations I Both Know & See. With Voice I Entirely Know, See & Hear." Conclusively this Section Must Never Ever be Deleted but Instead it Must be Allowed to Thrive, Flourish etc. & Encoureged too. So that we would be Able to See Some of the Facts of the Geography, History, Contributions of the Most Renowned Figures etc. of the Village Marghuz & their Relevany, Effects & Affects with the Geography, History, Contributions of the Most Renowned Figures etc. of the Entire Region & World throghout the Periods in a Particular Time Frame Each Time - about which Most of Us are Absolutely Ignorant so far. Such are also the Very Basic & Fundamental Aims & Objectives Behind the Creation of the Wikipedia etc. on the Net etc. (Internet etc.) i.e. to Share & Spread the Most Trust Worthy Knowledge in any Walk of Life & then Subject it to Open Discussion. The following Phrase is Quoted "Each Part of the World is like the Vital Organ of the Living Body of the Same Organism. Therefore the Health & Disease of any Part has all the Bearings on the Whole Body of that Very Organism." We all must be always knowing "The Eyes Do Not See which the Mind Does Not Know."

MarghuzVal&#39; (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

In Fact Almost all the Critics are More Eager to Delete Even an 'Infintely Comprehenssive Section' (like 'The Marghuz Va'li Illustrated'). But they themselves are Less Ready to Bring Up any Alternative Information or Such a Section on that Very Subject for the Knowledge Thursty Individuals (such Critics are Just Live Frogs & Toads Dwelling in Right in the Rainy Ponds). Indeed One Must be Positively Critic but Never Ever Negatively Critic. It is Most Obligatory for the Negative Critics to Suggest a Solution too & Never Just Critising an Infinitely Excellent Section like 'The Marghuz Va'li Illustrated.'

GarMunaraVal&#39; (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. This seems to be a case of Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, although I'm finding it difficult to understand just what the heck is being spoken of here.  It seems to me to be a collection of photographs that illustrate the history of an Indian village and its inhabitants.  Well, if there's anything that meets our notability standards, let's have an article about that specific person/event/building/whatever; and if these people/events/buildings/whatever relate specifically to the village Marghuz, then that might be an appropriate category by which to sort them (I doubt it, but it might).  This item, however, has no inherent notability that I can discern, there are no reliable sources provided, verifiability is entirely absent, and the article's creator seems to have a profound misunderstanding of both our criteria for inclusion and the rules of capitalization.  Accounting4Taste: talk 20:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Wikipedia is not an image gallery hosting provider. The "article" doesn't contain any easily recognizable encyclopedic content, and its title suggests that it wasn't meant to. --Latebird (talk) 21:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as unencyclopedic. Relevant information and images should go into the article on the village itself (Marghuz?). Joshdboz (talk) 01:45, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

MOST IMMEDIATE & HIGH/TOP PRIORITY.

Wikipedia

Respected Sir/Madam

If Possible Very Kindly Please Shift this Section to a Category Less than Deletion. This because as yet this Section is Under the Most Immediate Construction.

Thanking you Sir/Madam We remain

Yoiurs Vewry Sincerely

SwabiVal'
 * Comment It might be easier to understand with fewer Capital Letters. As It Stands, It has a Rather Eighteenth Century look. (Sorry, just trying to illustrate.) I couldn't face trying to delve into it tonight, but will look again tomorrow. Peridon (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.