Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Martinez Beaver Monster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deletion (G3). -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

The Martinez Beaver Monster

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is a hoax. The reference to the Contra Costa Times is non-existent and the web reference appears to have been set up to support the Wikipedia article. Additionally, nothing shows up in Google. ttonyb1 (talk) 18:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * G3 Blatant misinformation. If it were a giant otter monster, I might say weak keep just because otters are full of win (kidding). Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:52, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zero ghits, zero gnews hits. Besides, what self-respecting monster would live in Martinez? ;-P -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  19:52, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * A little further information. I'm surprised to learn that there are real beavers in Martinez. (I had assumed they were only further inland). However, I don't think a redirect to Martinez, California beavers is worthwhile.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  19:55, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.