Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Master as I Saw Him


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. I'm withdrawing the AfD on the basis of comments form people whose judgment I trust.  DGG ( talk ) 16:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

The Master as I Saw Him

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I see no evidence that this particular book is of any importance, though I do recognize the difficult of finding usable sources in this field.  DGG ( talk ) 04:13, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Another classic book nominated for deletion. This review will say everything. Widely used as reference in scholarly books. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 04:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have a feeling that there are probably more sources in other languages, but I found enough to show where this book is particularly well thought of as a classic text of Nivedita's. It's mentioned extensively in a few scholarly books and it's used as a source fairly frequently in others. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Tokyogirl79 DocumentError (talk) 06:12, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: Agree with Tokyogirl79, a quick search on Bengali Google puts up some decent hits. Ethically (Yours) 12:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 01:51, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 01:52, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 01:52, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.