Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Matrix character names (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 01:32, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

The Matrix character names
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research and fancruft, no citation since first nomination —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * delete, huge glob of unsourced and unnotable info Shii (tock) 06:18, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete just a long list of fancruft which is based upon original research. JBsupreme (talk) 06:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 'Delete Unencyclopedic original research.  Lugnuts  (talk) 17:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This would be perfect for [matrix.wikia.com| The Matrix Wiki]. Entertainment wikis are generally more tolerant about essays, original research, etc, and a lot of the episode, character and in-universe articles from Wikipedia's early days have gradually gone over to a more agreeable climate.  Mandsford (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: seems to be an original research, no reliable sources --Rirunmot 23:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rirunmot (talk • contribs)
 * Delete: without references to reliable sources for these interpretations, this is pure original research. -- The Anome (talk) 23:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete- original research amounting to a thinly disguised trivia page. If sources were to be found for the article, it would still be necessary to show how each and every "fact" meaningfully contributes to an understanding of the parent topic and/or its impact/legacy. - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Edward321 (talk) 17:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.