Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Meadows School (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ‑Scottywong | [confess] || 01:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

The Meadows School
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT / WP:NSCHOOL. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth.  // Timothy ::  talk  08:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  08:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  08:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep The school was important in the establishment of its planned community – see here, for example: "the premier secondary school in Southern Nevada". And it is still a keystone institution for the city – see there, for example: "this place is the nexus of power in Las Vegas".   Our policy WP:ATD applies: "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." Andrew🐉(talk) 10:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Sourcing meets WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment What articles meet SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth? This is all run of the mill, average coverage. The idea that this school is a "keystone" institution or "nexus of power" in Las Vegas is non-sense.  // Timothy ::  talk  13:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the school lacks multiple in-depth reliable sources about it that are neutral or otherwise. Clearly calling the school a "nexus of power" is hyperbolic and the reference saying so shouldn't be taken seriously. Also, last I checked Necrothesp thinks that WP:GNG doesn't exist and that anyone who cites it is just a smug troll. So, I have zero clue his vote is in reference to. Imaginary guidelines he doesn't believe in I guess? Or it is just some weird round about way of calling himself a smug troll? Who knows. Either way, this article should clearly be deleted.
 * Keep This is a clear-cut notable school with a well-developed article. I'm quite surprised that it's up for nomination at all. Additional sources on top of the ones already presented above include  . SportingFlyer  T · C  22:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * As if a local news story about a school fundraiser is a "clear-cut" pass of either WP:GNG or WP:NORG. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.