Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Meanest Genie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Jiggy McCue books. --  Rcsprinter  (talk)  10:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

The Meanest Genie

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NBOOK.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — Eagles   24/7   (C)  22:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails our book criteria, our general notability criteria, and no sources can be found anywhere. I'm barely sure it exists. — chro • man • cer 22:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. While this book may have not received any illustrious honors there are a few sources (mostly under Maggot Pie, the former title). And it does exist . Froggerlaura (talk) 23:49, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Wasn't saying it didn't. But having a few sources doesn't bring up to WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK. I haven't found any serious sources. Has it won any notable awards or anything like that? — chro • man • cer 01:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep or Merge into List of Jiggy McCue books, along with The Killer Underpants and The Poltergoose. Certainly a notable series of books, with The Poltergoose being shortlisted for a Blue Peter book award.  WormTT   &middot; &#32;(talk) 08:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: I agree that the series may be more notable than the individual books and support merging the content onto a single page. There are several that have won minor awards . Froggerlaura (talk) 14:57, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. I've moved it and all the other articles to List of Jiggy McCue books.  Rcsprinter  (talk)  09:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of Jiggy McCue books where the content currently exists. While not overly notable in an article itself, per the sources in the main article, does seem to barely qualify under the books notability policy for winning a few minor awards. Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  10:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.