Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Meatrix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. --jam es (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The Meatrix
Non-notable flash animation by non-notable company. The client they speak of doesn't even have its own article. Not on the level of "Jib Jab" in cultural importance. James Gordon 22:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Neutral. Keep I had prodded this article in the past, and someone else deprodded it.  When I looked more closely, I found taht this flash animation actually won a few independent-looking awards.  I left a link on the page to the awards list; I was able to confirm some of those awards; others were on web pages that are expired now.  B/C of that, I didn't take the article to AfD myself.  Mango juice talk 23:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep on the basis of the awards the animation has won. It's off on the sides, yes, but it clears the notability hurdle. —C.Fred (talk) 23:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Article is completely self referencing. The link to the awards is on the movies own site. The awards sited are equally non-notable and I doubt would make the cut as separate articles. If three uninteresting people say they know an equally uninteresting person is that notability?--James Gordon 00:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Like I said, that was laziness on my part, but the awards I tried to verify, I mostly was able to. It would be nice if the article said a little more about them, rather than just "The Meatrix has won several awards," which was fine when the article was a 3-line stub.  Mango juice talk 11:46, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per C.Fred. Danny Lilithborne 01:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, yes the awards are listed on their own page, but it's easy to verify the awards they won from there. And "2005 Webby Awards Winner" isn't too shabby. - Mgm|(talk) 09:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, now that you mention it, the Webby award is specifically listed as an example of an award that establishes notability in WP:WEB. Changing my vote to keep now, as I'm sure.  Mango juice talk 14:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see why it should be deleted. Wiki-newbie 18:14, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.