Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Message of You


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Judy Carter. No argument for why it should be deleted before redirection. (non-admin closure) czar ♔   21:10, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

The Message of You

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article should be merged with deleted and turned into a redirect to (see below) Judy Carter, as there are no reliable secondary sources indicating significance. Grayfell (talk) 21:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

I misspoke. The article should not be WP:MERGEed, rather, it should be deleted, and optionally replaced with a redirect. In my opinion, there no content here worth copying over, and any mention of the book at Judy Carter should be added from scratch in a NPOV tone. I don't believe this is needed, as the book is already sufficiently explained at that article. Grayfell (talk) 23:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 23:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Redirect to Judy Carter. I found some passing mentions here and there, but not really anything that would really show me that this book merits an article outside of its author. The only two promising ones I found were this article and this one, and I'm not overly familiar with the first source so I don't know if that could be usable or not. It seems legit and this would give it two reviews, but I'm always slightly hesitant to create an article on only 1-2 reviews when I don't have other coverage to go with it. I do get the impression somewhat that there might be other sources out there, so if anyone can find them then I'm willing to be persuaded to change my argument. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 23:03, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.