Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Misanthropic Bitch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

The Misanthropic Bitch

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Controversial blog during its time, and certainly one of the first of its kind - but not notable enough to merit a Wikipedia article. It doesn't pass WP:WEBCRIT, and WP:INHERENTWEB should also be referred to. pinktoebeans (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  pinktoebeans  (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  pinktoebeans  (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  pinktoebeans  (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  pinktoebeans  (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per above, and per my own review of it. I had hoped there would be some meat-and-potatoes in terms of sources, but after culling all the blogs, dead links, and articles that made no mention of the subject, there is precisely one confirmed article in the San Francisco Chronicle that mentions it, which I confirmed by finding the url for it (only the print info had been cited up until now), and added it to the citation. The other is another non-online source called San Francisco Metropolitan, and I have no way of vetting its content, since I couldn't find any mention of that publication via a Google search, so I don't even know if it passes WP:IRS, or even exists. Nightscream (talk) 03:00, 3 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per what pinktoebeans said. It is a piece of Internet history, and worthy I think of being saved in the Internet Archive, but I am not sure it belongs on Wikipedia? Mpc60ii (talk) 21:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete To keep a closed website, it would have to have a high Alexa score (rating of websites) and this one does not figure on alexa. It does not meet WP:WEBCRIT insofar as there are no independent sources evaluating the site. Yes, Archive.org is the best place for this site. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:46, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.