Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mole (MC/producer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 02:40, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

The Mole (MC/producer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Odd little one, has been up for AfD before back in 2005 and has yet really to show anything to support notability. Most of the article seems like self-promotion as few other editors besides some anons and SPAs are maintaining the article. For someone with as long a discography as they have (bearing in mind it's a partial one too) it seems highly unlikely that this article in all the time its been around has gone with absolutely no sourcing at all.

So, simple recap, fails WP:BIO, WP:BAND, isn't verifiable outside of first party sources and is essentially a longstanding puff piece that escaped deletion for so long through simple obscurity. tutterMouse (talk) 21:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree, not notable Themanfromscene24 (talk) 05:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I was unable to find any sources. There's nothing on him on Google Books or News when I try "The Mole" + various keywords. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Simply because I didn't link to it in the first place and for disclousure, here's the previous AfD from 2005 tutterMouse (talk) 22:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.