Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Moosepath League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (jarbarf) (talk) 23:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

The Moosepath League

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:FICT.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 19:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC) It seems reasonable to add the Moosepath League series. I was surprised to find there was no existing entry. It is a popular book series published internationally by major publishers and a wiki entry should attract additional information from informed sources to build into a useful resource. The first book in the series was picked as a NY Times notable book of 1998. The series has a large following of fans and is an interesting series artistically since the characters parallel the Pickwick Papers of Charles Dickens. To exclude it based on the fact that you can google some information already implies that the wiki entries on series of books by most authors should be deleted from wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CaptainPea (talk • contribs) 20:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect – to author’s page. (I’ll start a stub in the next day or two).  There certainly is a enough information out there, as shown here  for an article.   ShoesssS Talk 19:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I think this should be retained for the following reason . ..
 * Keep, meets criteria 1 WP:BK per NY Times review.--Finalnight (talk) 20:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge notable book. NYT notable is sufficient.Yobmod (talk) 09:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - NYT editor's choice PhilKnight (talk) 19:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.