Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Morgan Waters Show


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

The Morgan Waters Show

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:V. Only source used is IMDb, which has (time and time again) been shot down as an unreliable, user edited source for Wikipedia. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 (did I do something wrong? let me know! 17:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 (did I do something wrong? let me know! 17:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 (did I do something wrong? let me know! 17:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article definitely needed some cleanup and better referencing, but that's now been done — and the series won a Gemini Award, which is exactly the tier of top-level national television awards that clinch the inherent notability of a television series regardless of any other problems with the article. For a TV show that aired 15 years ago, by the way, the best sourcing will need to be retrieved from archives (ProQuest, newspapers.com, etc.) rather than being expected to Google well. Bearcat (talk) 13:24, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep The sources added by Bearcat are also SIGCOV for the series from major Canadian newspapers, and the Gemini Award clinches notability. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 22:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect preferable but Keep acceptable I personally think it's better in one article but with the award would probably minimally meet GNG Unbroken Chain (talk) 22:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.