Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mostar Diving Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz Humbug! 05:26, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

The Mostar Diving Club

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article makes no attempt to assert the band's notability or give a coherent timeline, and not much more than the sources already given can be found. The one footnoted reference is a record company promo. The external link from Broadway World is a fairly descriptive intro but serves mostly as a gig announcement, and their album "Here Comes Joy" received a couple of brief reviews. Otherwise only the typical routine listings can be found. It might be too soon for this band. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 14:40, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 14:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 14:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 14:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. The points you raise are very well-taken! I had created the stub article hoping others would jump in, but only a few new contributions have rolled in.  I have added a basic timeline, mentions of their music appearing in film and prominent commercials, and provided a richer set of references to support the content in this entry.  I hope this goes some way towards resolving the concerns raised.  Thank you for flagging this once again.  Fanyavizuri (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I appreciate the initial editor's enthusiasm, but unfortunately the sources provided don't pass muster. Sources added since this article was first nominated include more citations to the same music blog previously cited: forfolkssake.com, to IMDb (unreliable), and which does not look like reliable secondary source coverage. I would also add that Rough Trade is a record label and the content cited there does not include a byline, leading me to suspect that it is less a review and rather a promotional blurb from a source that is trying to sell you the album. signed,Rosguill talk 21:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.