Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mouse and His Child (1967) by Russell Hoban vs. The Animated Film: The Extraordinary Adventures of the Mouse and His Child (1977)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as WP:NOT violation, as this is at best a personal blog post/review of the book and film. It also qualifies as WP:A10, since it doesn't really expand on the pre-existing articles for the book and film. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

The Mouse and His Child (1967) by Russell Hoban vs. The Animated Film: The Extraordinary Adventures of the Mouse and His Child (1977)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:INFO. Falls under the banned "indiscriminate information", comparisons aren't something that, in most cases, belong in an encyclopedia. Westroopnerd (talk) 00:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 07:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 07:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh my. That's really the title? In any case, I'm going to go ahead and close this. The article is entirely a personal WP:OR essay and we already have articles on the book and the film. There may be a case for a section talking about the differences between the different media, but this article isn't really about that - it's more on the writer's personal opinions about how the book and film came across to them. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.