Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mouse with the Question Mark Tail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure). Joseph2302 (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

The Mouse with the Question Mark Tail

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Half-written article about a book. No evidence it's notable, fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. Would be happy to userfy it if consensus is to do so. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:NBOOK. Seems to be a draft article since almost every section is empty. If notability can be proven on the future, then a simple userfy would be useful. --TL22 (talk) 01:10, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Userfy per Whpq's vote. The article can be later completed. --TL2</b><b style= "color:#FFA700">2</b> (<i style= "color:green">talk</i>) 01:26, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Articles should be judged on notability, and not the condition in which they are in. Userfying would hide the article from other editors, and quite frankly, the original author is not likely to be very good at editting the article.  In any case, I have cleaned it up and added sources. -- Whpq (talk) 02:09, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Well now it is ok, so Keep. --<b style= "color:red">T</b><b style= "color:#FF4200">L</b><b style= "color:#FF7400">2</b><b style= "color:#FFA700">2</b> (<i style= "color:green">talk</i>) 02:32, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep being a stub is not grounds for deletion. Reviews in Deseret News, Christian Science Monitor, SChool Library Jornal, and a capsule review in the Wall Street Journal were easily found. -- Whpq (talk) 01:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. There are enough sources now to pass NBOOK. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. tutterMouse (talk) 07:09, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree with the "Keeps" above. I see no serious issue with it now. Articles in progress often start off "messy" then they grow up.  HullIntegrity  \ talk / 11:08, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Withdrawing Clearly I'm just really bad at finding book reviews, I was looking for 2 book reviews, in order to pass WP:NBOOK, but couldn't find any. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.