Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mystery Of Mazandaran's Daevas (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

The Mystery Of Mazandaran's Daevas (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent references. Contains too little information to be a useful stub. Appears to be promotional for the book. Google search turns up nothing about this title. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:06, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  18:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Can't find any sources anywhere to show secondary refs. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  Lady  of  Shalott  21:28, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: I found no sources. SL93 (talk) 02:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep:Original source added And was also added to the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tumasp (talk • contribs) 13:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC) *Keep: Other sources added to the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tumasp (talk • contribs) 10:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks the coverage by independent reliable sources needed for WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. The article has no independent sources. Searching found nothing helpful. Gab4gab (talk) 16:39, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , Although you have added sources they don't appear to satisfy any notability guideline. If you disagree please explain which source/sources satisfy what particular notability guideline elements. Also, you can only !vote once. Gab4gab (talk) 11:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:NBOOK for lack of significant coverage of the book. There is an existing article on the mythological Kay Kāvus. There is no evidence that this book is a reliable source for that mythology.  It seems clear to me that this article is also intended to be promotional. I saw nothing in the added citations that would go towards the notability of this book. --Bejnar (talk) 22:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.