Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Narrative Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Jenks24 (talk) 09:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

The Narrative Music

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable, fails WP:MUSICBIO, previous article was The Narrative which was CSD'd 3x on A7, creator repeated removing CSD on his own articles and has been referred to AIV. GregJackP  Boomer!   00:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The page not deleted. All article is from google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murilo Grillo (talk • contribs) 20:01, 5 August 2012‎
 * The comment above was reverted for incorrect placement and lack of a signature early in the discussion. It seems to me better to place it properly and attribute it using unsigned2, particularly since the user is now blocked, so that his comment can be seen, for what it is worth. Simply reverting the comment of an obvious newcomer seems a bit WP:BITEy to me. DES (talk) 04:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I prod-ed this earlier, but after some research I have found at least two significant mentions in Reliable sources, now added to the Critical Reception section of the article. By the way, a much better search is: -- far less overwhelmed with false positives, particularly on the 2nd and 3rd results pages of the web search.  This band doesn't meet the specific criteria of WP:MUSIC but i think it does meet the genreal notability guideline, being discussed non-trivially in multiple independent reliable sources. The article creator is obviously new to wikipedia, and hasn't been listening as well as he should, but that should have no bearign on the merit of the article itself. DES (talk) 01:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment to clarify, creator info and article previous deletion were not meant to be arguments for deletion, but were for general background. My argument for deletion is primarily musicbio, followed by GNG.   GregJackP   Boomer!   03:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh, if kept, this should be moved back to The Narrative or perhaps better to The Narrative (band). By the way, the A7 speedies were probably a mistake, as shown by the dclined speedies (twice) on this version. It may not be notable, but there are clearly "claims of significance" here, IMO. DES (talk) 01:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename to The Narrative (band), following Mr Siegel's suggestions. Inclusion in Newsday and The Star-Ledger is sufficient to establish notability. Meph talk 02:19, 6 August 2012 (UTC).
 * I'm up to 5 cited sources in the article now. DES (talk) 02:59, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per the improvements made to the article after the nomination. Enough coverage exists in independent reliable sources to meet WP:GNG and criterion 1 of WP:BAND. Name change would be the right call, as well.  Gongshow  Talk 05:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep – per WP:HEY, because the article is being improved with reliable sources comprised of significant coverage and per meeting WP:GNG:
 * Snow at night.jpg


 * Star-Ledger article
 * Newsday article
 * Newsday article
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 14:26, 8 August 2012 (UTC)


 * FYI: The article has been moved, by another editor, to The Narrative (band). I would have done this after the close, assuming this is kept. DES (talk) 21:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.