Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The National 9/11 Debate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Rje 15:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

The National 9/11 Debate
Crystal-balling event with no coverage. Moreover, it's clearly a publicity stunt. Anyone thinking that the government will lend credibility to this group by participating is deluding themselves. Mmx1 06:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, looking at the maze of websites linked from its sister-article, I think "deluding themselves" is most of these people's raison d'etre. Delete. Vizjim 10:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom KleenupKrew 10:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, with reservations I'd feel a lot more comfortable if there was any evidence that the government of the US even acknowledged receipt of the invitation, but this does pass Wikipedia is not a crystal ball by my reckoning, and if the event does come to pass, it will certainly be notable. Colon el Tom 11:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can always be recreated if said government members turn up. -- Tangot a ngo 15:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. 1652186 18:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I tried to find information regarding the government accepting, however none is found, no acknowledgement what so ever. For not it seems like promotional material unless the government acknowledges ever.--Zer0faults 20:25, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Article as written borders on fantasy. "Government team?" --Craig Stuntz 20:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. Maybe the debate will be notable, but it isn't yet. --Metropolitan90 03:32, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete the article can be recreated later if it seems the event is confirmed and appears to be receiving notable media coverage.--DCAnderson 03:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete soapboxing - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 14:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is neither a soapbox nor a crystal-ball. Stifle (talk) 18:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- you've got to be kidding. Soapboxing to the Nth degree.  Violates WP:OR, WP:NOT.  Morton devonshire 19:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into the Scholars for 9/11 Truth article as one of the initiatives of this group EyesAllMine 09:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom. --Aude ( talk | contribs ) 18:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete hugely fails google test of notability . -MrFizyx 22:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.