Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Necromancer: The Secrets of the Immortal Nicholas Flamel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete as failing WP:RS and WP:N. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The Necromancer: The Secrets of the Immortal Nicholas Flamel
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article was deleted before; it has been brought back again and still doesn't appear notable; just a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Not even the external link listed on the page leads to any information about the release of the book or if the book is even in the works. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 00:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Guest: I've re-written the article, hopefully making it more relevant. I do not think this article should be deleted yet. Undoubtedly, developments in the near future will add to the article, and when the book does come out next year, there will be a full article, including plot summary, critical acclaim and references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.5.175.44 (talk) 03:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Guest: I agree with Guest, this article has citations to verifiable sources now and would just have to be recreated in a very few months as more information about the book comes out. This article should be left and people should be encouraged to add more content to it such as a basic plot summary of the series of books and other useful items. It could also contain references to forums where the book is discussed that are reachable through the author's website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.234.143.174 (talk) 17:47, 17 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.