Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Never Gone Tour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 02:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

The Never Gone Tour

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable tour Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 20:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable tour that fails WP:GNG.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 22:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Major tour by major pop group.  The nom's notion that concert tours are inherently unnotable is badly flawed. In many cases, concert tours are artistic endeavors of their own, due to staging, presentation themes, song selection, arrangements, etc. And in many cases, concert tours are seen by more people than buy the same artists' albums or singles, and are more commercially important to the artist.  There's no reason this article can't be as good as Into the Millennium Tour.  And even in its present state, it doesn't "inherit" notability any worse than the barebones The Hits: Chapter One article does, which is hardly more than a track listing.  Wasted Time R (talk) 19:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Simply making an artist a lot of money does not make something notable, nor does complexity of the stage show make it notable. If there isn't substantial, non-trival coverage, then it isn't notable enough. Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 19:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Conditional keep - there is no doubt about the notability of the act. If the article can be sourced with non-promotional citations (say. from local news sites) demonstrating widespread coverage of the tour would assuage much of the objections stated above. B.Wind (talk) 03:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.