Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Hate: A History of Fear and Loathing on the Populist Right


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. per WP:SNOW and the general sense that there is no need to further spend time on this discussion NW ( Talk ) 07:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

The New Hate: A History of Fear and Loathing on the Populist Right

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book that fails to meet any of the necessary criteria specified at Notability (books).  Belch fire - TALK 04:20, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Meets criterion one to begin with, as the small sample of sources in the further reading section demonstrates. Has the nominator considered WP:BEFORE and an attempt at actually reading the books notability guideline that he cites? Viriditas (talk) 04:57, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - In addition to the reference already in the article, there are other non-trivial sources including Salon, Willamette Week, The Atlantic, The Porland Mercury, Huffington Post, a couple of minor newspaper mentions and several other Ghits that I did not follow. It seems to more than meet the notability requirements of WP:NBOOK. - MrX 04:58, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and warn Belchfire that retaliation noms are not acceptable, per WP:POINT. I understand you have a disagreement, with Viriditas, but wasting our time on your feelings is disruptive. Killer Chihuahua 10:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and warn nominator for abuse of process. With multiple coverage of the subject in academia and the high-end press, this nomination stretches WP:AGF to the breaking point. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 13:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * STRONG KEEP (and Warn) - per Boris and Killer above.--Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 01:31, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Well, what's above pretty much covers it; a nomination oblivious to WP:BEFORE for a book that passes WP:NBOOKS. Go   Phightins  !  02:37, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.