Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Jersey Churchscape


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 10:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The New Jersey Churchscape

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability for 5 years; I couldn't establish notability. Boleyn (talk) 20:59, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I would say a revue in the New York Times denotes notability. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Not really a review: a one-paragraph blurb, really. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 06:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep It didn't take me long to find a review published at library.villanova.edu.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:45, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That review doesn't really signify much. It's a one-paragraph review that's actually from Choice, a journal of the American Library Association, which publishes 7,000 reviews a year, basically just to help acquisitions librarians. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 06:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:02, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:02, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.