Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New York Pizza Connection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

The New York Pizza Connection

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

First of all, "New York Pizza Connection" gives only 899 results on Google, many of which are about other "pizza connections", not this one, so it is not quite notable. Secondly, this article is terribly written and includes not only weasel words but also a rhetorical question. dicttrshp (talk) 17:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 19:09, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep It's sourced. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It looks like this theory was adopted by a bunch of journalists who heard it, but not very widespread outside the articles they wrote. Perhaps a brief mention in the article on the New York Subway is a better idea? - Mgm|(talk) 15:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep but Rename to "Pizza Principle" which is also discussed in article. Pizza connection has a very different connotation.  Article is souced and the phrase looks like the sort of thing that's going to keep showing up in the New Yorker (or some future book by Malcolm Gladwell), and which out-of-towners will need to look up in WP. Squidfryerchef (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as this crackpot scientific theory fails WP:SPECULATION. --Gavin Collins (talk) 09:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep had had third party coverage . Michellecrisp (talk) 05:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.