Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The News Line


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Shanel 01:02, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

The News Line
Notability debated. Moved to AfD. Jaxal1 04:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Apparently this article is "a candidate for speedy deletion" because it may be "an article about a real person or group of people that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject (CSD A7)". I don't know what that pseudolegalistic tripe is supposed to mean (and I don't much care), but Wikipedia cannot be only about things that "are important or significant", for two reasons: firstly, "importance or significance" is a subjective judgement which can't be legislated for in any sane system, and secondly if we still intend to create the greatest encyclopaedia there has ever been then we need articles about everything under the sun, and there are plenty of things under ther sun that aren't important or significant.  But never mind that.  The need for this article arises because several other articles link here, and the context of the links doesn't always make it clear what News Line actually is.  The best way for a reader to find out what The News Line is, is to click on the link and read the stub.  Also, this is a very remarkable publication.  Not so much for what it says, but simply because it continues to come out, day after day and year after year.  A teeny-tiny political sect produces a daily newspaper.  A real one, with TV reviews and sports results and colour pictures and columnists and everything.  How do they do it?  Where does the money come from?  Apparently, at one time there were two rival WRPs each producing its own rival daily News Line! It's a great subject for a wikipedia article.  We need to know more!  GrahamN 03:18, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * FYI, phrases like "does not assert the importance or significance of the subject" are the result of attempts to find a way to quickly get rid of things like high school clubs and bands - we get a lot of newbie articles about them. Kappa 04:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, daily newspaper. Kappa 05:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. exisiting, functioning paper.  psch  e  mp  |  talk  05:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up. JoshuaZ 06:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Daily media publications are notable. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. PJM 04:55, 25 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.