Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Next Head of the Unification Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

The Next Head of the Unification Church

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No indication that this organization has been covered any where other than this article. Makes a number of serious accusations without source Leivick (talk) 00:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, insufficient context. I have no idea what the heck this article is about.  Powers T 01:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Non notable church, no sources, POV galore. I wouldn't be surprised if this is a copyvio, too. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 01:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks like I didn't understand the original article....


 * Strong Delete POV essay, fails WP:NOR and WP:CRYSTAL. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 01:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment The Unification Church is plenty notable and has a perfectly fine article. The above two !voters could have found the context and the church's notability quite easily by searching on keywords in this article's title. Jclemens (talk) 01:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but no. The context has to be in the article, not somewhere out there in the great Internet ether. Powers T 12:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as speedy decliner. Fails WP:CRYSTAL, is substantially an OR essay. Jclemens (talk) 01:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  —Jclemens (talk) 01:29, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Yellowweasel (talk) 01:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete A mess of an article, possibly spam. Ancemy (talk) 03:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a speculative essay, so it fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:OR standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 11:51, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't make much sense of this page. It looks like somebody copied the text of a Wikipedia page (without the wikicoding, so that the references got separated from the text they were supposed to refer to), along with part of a talk page including some signatures. We already have a section of an article that discusses this topic in a much better way at Unification Church. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow delete Per the many comments and arguements above. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 18:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.