Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nightmare Before Christmas: The Pumpkin King (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 05:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

The Nightmare Before Christmas: The Pumpkin King
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

purely promotional PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 20:52, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep has been reviewed by NintendoWorldReport, GameSpy, IGN, and Nintendo Power. Meets the GNG. Has content issues (WP:FANCRUFT), but I don't think it needs to be completely deleted. --Odie5533 (talk) 17:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - I don't see anything blatantly promotional in the article, although there is a lot of cruft. However, as Odie demonstrated above, there is plenty of coverage for the game to pass notability guidelines, should one bother to search a little.  Salvidrim!   08:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - plenty of reliable sources can be found. I've removed the WP:FANCRUFT and added a reliable source. Satellizer  talk  contribs 09:24, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep as passing WP:GNG with multiple WP:VG/RS. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 12:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep as passing WP:GNG, meets notability standards of a videogame article. Jucchan (talk) 06:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Plenty of reliable source coverage. Meets the WP:GNG. Sergecross73   msg me   13:40, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.